Post by account_disabled on Dec 25, 2023 4:07:33 GMT
It's a question, because I often ask myself that. Leaving aside the explicit requests for stories of a specific narrative genre , as we read about in various literary competitions , when you think of a story, do you think about the genre in which to categorize it? I do not. The story just comes to mind . The idea comes to mind, the situation to be developed. If there's a ghost inside or a dead person coming out of his tomb, then it's horror, but if it's a plumber left alone in a spaceship, then it's science fiction. But I don't start my story thinking about the literary genre it belongs to. I prefer to be free to make it grow as my imagination wants. I don't like cage like that. I don't want to feel like a prisoner of a label.
At the same time I have no problem writing by immediately identifying the story in its genre. I'm participating in the Grand Prix and the Royal Rumble of the La Tela Nera forum, where the narrative genre is a must. No problem. But those are stories that are in a certain sense commanded. If you like writing, you just write them. If, however, you write your own story, which starts from within yourself, which is yours and not Special Data suggested by someone else, then for me the matter is different. So the story is a story and that's it. I can see multiple genres mixed together. It can be a fantasy horror, a drama that takes place in the future, a modern-day fairy tale. For me, history is more important than literary genre. The latter is just an invention created to archive stories. Not to lead them.
When you write do you immediately think about the narrative genre? Or do you just think about the story?A thematic union must therefore be created between the topic of the page or article and the page that has been linked. Going back to the previous example on phrases or words chosen at random, or almost randomly, to link to a page, the right and appropriate way to communicate your resource to a user would have been: There is a lot of talk online about writing for the web, I also read an article by Daniele on how to link to a web page ."Take the reader back in time or forward into the future.She noticed that people, approaching him, immediately distanced themselves from him, as if they were afraid of trespassing or being bitten, or even contaminated.The mass follows the mass, not the individual. He was amazed to ask himself, or rather to imagine, if an individual, just one, could move the masses.
At the same time I have no problem writing by immediately identifying the story in its genre. I'm participating in the Grand Prix and the Royal Rumble of the La Tela Nera forum, where the narrative genre is a must. No problem. But those are stories that are in a certain sense commanded. If you like writing, you just write them. If, however, you write your own story, which starts from within yourself, which is yours and not Special Data suggested by someone else, then for me the matter is different. So the story is a story and that's it. I can see multiple genres mixed together. It can be a fantasy horror, a drama that takes place in the future, a modern-day fairy tale. For me, history is more important than literary genre. The latter is just an invention created to archive stories. Not to lead them.
When you write do you immediately think about the narrative genre? Or do you just think about the story?A thematic union must therefore be created between the topic of the page or article and the page that has been linked. Going back to the previous example on phrases or words chosen at random, or almost randomly, to link to a page, the right and appropriate way to communicate your resource to a user would have been: There is a lot of talk online about writing for the web, I also read an article by Daniele on how to link to a web page ."Take the reader back in time or forward into the future.She noticed that people, approaching him, immediately distanced themselves from him, as if they were afraid of trespassing or being bitten, or even contaminated.The mass follows the mass, not the individual. He was amazed to ask himself, or rather to imagine, if an individual, just one, could move the masses.